2010 NATIONAL TIMBER BRIDGE DESIGN COMPETITION Summary of Results For 2010 competition rules click here. To view individual entries, click on the team name below.
School/ Team	Net Bridge Deflection1 -% of allowable	Net Deck Deflection2 - % of allowable	Total Bridge Weight (kg)	Percent Non-Wood (%)3	Best Overall Design	Best Support Structure	Best Deck	Most Practical Design	Most Aesthetic Design	Most Innovative Design
U. S. Military Academy ASCE	48	8.6	432	7.20	1	4	1	6-tie	1	1
SD School of Mines & Tech. ASCE (arch truss)	15.2	16.4	498	2.00	5	1	8	7	-	5
Oregon State University FPS	62.7	14.1	686	2.12	8	9	9	6-tie	-	8-tie
Univ. of Arkansas-Little Rock FPS	95.5	58.6	304	2.08	10	10	4	5-tie	-	7
San Francisco State Univ. ASCE (under arch)	31.9	15.9	439	7.75	2	2	2	4	2	2
Oklahoma State Univ. ASCE (beam team)	49.3	21.2	442	3.74	7	5	7	3	--	6-tie
ACE Academy of Arch., Const. ^ Engineering (HS Team)	96.5	29.2	404	7.86	**	-	-	-	-	-
San Francisco State Univ. ASCE (deck and box beams)	56.9	4.8	603	1.28	6	7	8	5-tie	-	8-tie
DS School of Mines & Tech. ASCE (parallel truss)	98.3	1.1	206	2.05	9	8	3	6-tie	-	6-tie
San Francisco State Univ. ASCE (timber truss)	68.4	93.9	356	13.5	4	6	5	1	3	4
Oklahoma State Univ. ASCE (truss team)	35.6	39.7	635	7.27	3	3	6	2	-	3
This competition is open to all ASCE and FPS Student Chapters at univerities and college across the U.S. and Canada. 2010 was the 18th year of this event. 1Maximum allowed = bridge span ÷ 400;         2 Maximum allowable = deck span ÷ 100                         3 Maximum allowed = 25% ASCE - American Society of Civil Engineers      FPS - Forest Products Society ** - high school team that entered for the experience; not eligible for award.

©2010 Mississippi Association of Resource Conservation and Development Councils. Report errors to: Keith Mazer.